When a woman is convicted, the rules change.
The tools that free innocent men were not built for her case.
Most exonerated women were convicted of crimes that never happened.
When researchers separate "wrongful conviction" cases by sex, the numbers split: 72% for women, 38% for men. The gap is the story.
226 of 316 exonerated women and 1,241 of 3,349 exonerated men. Source: National Registry of Exonerations, Female Exonerees. The 26% child-victim figure (81 of 316) and the day-care case figures below come from the same page.
Of exonerated women
were wrongly convicted in cases where no crime was committed by anyone. An accident. A natural death. A false allegation. A misread medical report.
Of exonerated men
were convicted in no-crime cases. Most exonerated men were convicted of crimes that did happen. Most exonerated women were not.
For most innocent men, the question is who did it. For most innocent women, the question is whether it happened at all.
DNA has freed hundreds. Very few of them are women.
Only 15 women had been exonerated with the help of DNA evidence, compared with more than 300 men.
DNA testing is the surest path out of a wrongful conviction, but it works only when there is biological evidence of a crime to test. In a case where no crime happened, there is nothing to test, no second suspect and no one to identify.
The most powerful tool the innocence movement has does not reach most of the women who need it.
Source: Innocence Project, March 2020, citing the National Registry of Exonerations.
When the state cannot point to a perpetrator, a victim, or a piece of forensic evidence, what remains is a question about the defendant herself. Did she sound like the kind of woman this might have happened to? Did she cry the right way? Did she love her children enough?
This is not a question evidence can answer. It is a credibility contest, decided on the basis of how the woman in the chair compares to a juror's idea of what a mother, a wife, a caregiver is supposed to look like.
"How do you say, 'No, I was really a great mother?' It becomes a very difficult task to disprove the negative." Jessica S. Henry · Montclair State University, quoted in The Appeal
When the only evidence is medical, the case is often decided by expert testimony. For decades, a leading example has been testimony about shaken baby syndrome, now often called abusive head trauma. Convictions resting on that diagnosis alone have been challenged in court, and some have been overturned.
Of the 40 people exonerated in shaken baby cases listed by the National Registry of Exonerations, 15 are women.
26% of exonerated women were convicted of a crime against a child.
It follows a pattern. Women in the United States are still the primary caregivers, and when something goes wrong in a home — when a baby dies, when a partner is hurt, when a child makes a false allegation — the woman in the room is the first suspect.
Most criminal cases in the United States end in a guilty plea, not a trial. A woman charged in a child's death may face a possible life sentence if she goes to trial and loses. The state may offer her a lesser charge and fewer years if she pleads.
Innocent women take that offer. They take it to get home to their other children sooner, or because their lawyer tells them the jury will not believe them. A guilty plea then makes every later step harder, because she told a judge, under oath, that she did it. Her petition must explain why.
Some women are convicted because of a man in their life. A mother is charged for failing to protect a child from a partner who hurt the child. A woman is charged as an accomplice to a crime her partner committed, sometimes while he was abusing her too.
Other women defended themselves and were not believed. The National Registry of Exonerations counts a conviction for a death caused by legitimate self-defense as a case where no crime occurred.
Some states now have laws written for these women. New York and Illinois have laws that let some survivors of abuse ask to be resentenced. See the other doors →
In the 1980s and 1990s, day-care workers and teachers across the country were prosecuted for child sex abuse that never happened. The cases were built on statements from young children who had been questioned again and again by adults who expected to hear about abuse.
The Registry lists 26 women exonerated in these cases. They make up 8% of all exonerated women, compared with 1% of exonerated men.
The six causes of a wrongful conviction.
The National Registry of Exonerations records what went wrong in every case it lists. It finds the same six causes again and again. Most wrongful convictions have more than one.
Every one of these causes can be raised in her petition. A lawyer who failed her, evidence that was hidden, an expert who was wrong: these are the reasons a court will reopen a case. See how the process works →
- National Registry of Exonerations — Female Exonerees
- National Registry of Exonerations — How the Registry defines each cause
- Innocence Project — 8 Facts About Incarcerated and Wrongfully Convicted Women (March 2020)
- The Appeal — Why Women's Wrongful Convictions Are So Difficult to Overcome
- New England Innocence Project — Women wrongfully convicted for tragic accidents
- Georgia Innocence Project — Wrongful Convictions Among Women
No court looks again unless she asks.
She asks with paperwork: a petition, filed in the right court, before its deadline. Miss the deadline and she can lose her chance for good. There are four forms. The first two have longer deadlines, set by her state and by federal law. The two sentence forms close within weeks or months of sentencing.
We get her the forms for her state, with every deadline. Find her state →
Each of these women had to prove that nothing happened.
That is the hardest thing to prove in a courtroom, and harder still from a prison cell.
If you are that woman — or you know her — we are here.
Free. Always. No exceptions.